Calculating Return on Investment for Underpinning Services

Calculating Return on Investment for Underpinning Services

Project Scope Definition and Permitting Requirements for Foundation Repair

Okay, so lets talk about underpinning and ROI. Its not exactly the sexiest topic, is it? Were not talking about rocket science or AI here, but about concrete and, well, underpinning. But hold on, because understanding the costs associated with underpinning and then figuring out the return on investment can be surprisingly important. Think of it this way: its about protecting your biggest asset – your property – and making sure youre doing it in a smart, financially sound way.


First, lets unpack the "understanding underpinning." The relationship between water and your foundation is like that toxic ex who keeps coming back to cause more damage foundation stability check Chicagoland Facebook. Were not just talking about sticking some concrete under a wall. Its about diagnosing the problem. Why does the building need underpinning in the first place? Is it subsidence, poor soil, nearby construction? The "why" dictates the "how," and the "how" directly impacts the cost. A simple crack might need a simple solution, but a major structural issue demands a more complex and, yes, expensive approach. So, you need a good assessment; think of it as getting a proper medical diagnosis before you start treatment.


Now, about the costs. This isnt just about the materials and labor. Its about the whole shebang. Permits, engineering reports, the potential for unexpected problems (because lets face it, things rarely go exactly as planned!), and even the disruption to your life. If youre living in the property while the work is done, youre talking about dust, noise, and a general invasion of privacy. That has a cost, even if its just the cost of your sanity.


And then, finally, ROI. How do you calculate the return on investment for something like underpinning? Its not as straightforward as, say, installing solar panels. Youre not necessarily generating direct revenue. Instead, the ROI comes from several areas. First, preserving or even increasing the property value. A house with structural problems is worth significantly less than a structurally sound one. Underpinning fixes the problem, potentially preventing a huge loss in value. Second, preventing further damage. Catching a problem early can save you a fortune in the long run. Think of it as preventative medicine for your house. A small investment now can prevent a catastrophic (and much more expensive) collapse later. Third, peace of mind. Knowing your property is stable and safe is worth something, right? Its hard to put a precise dollar figure on it, but its a real benefit.


So, while calculating the ROI on underpinning might seem like a dry, technical exercise, its really about making informed decisions to protect your investment, your safety, and even your sanity. Its about understanding the problem, acknowledging the full range of costs, and then weighing those costs against the long-term benefits. And that, my friends, is something worth considering.

When considering the return on investment (ROI) for underpinning services, its crucial to identify both the direct and indirect benefits that this structural enhancement provides. Underpinning, which involves strengthening and stabilizing the foundation of a building, is not just a necessary intervention for safety but also an investment with multifaceted returns.


Direct benefits are the most tangible and immediate outcomes of underpinning. Firstly, theres the preservation of property value. A building with a compromised foundation can significantly depreciate in value due to structural integrity concerns. By investing in underpinning, homeowners or property managers ensure that their asset retains or even increases in market value, offering a clear financial return. Moreover, underpinning directly addresses safety issues by preventing potential collapses or extensive damage from subsidence or settlement, thereby avoiding costly emergency repairs and insurance claims which could be far more expensive than proactive underpinning.


Indirect benefits, while less immediately quantifiable, contribute significantly to the long-term ROI. One key indirect benefit is the enhancement of property usability. A stable foundation allows for future renovations or expansions without fear of structural failure, thus increasing the functional space or improving living conditions within the property. This can lead to increased rental income if the property is leased out or higher resale value when put on the market due to modernized facilities.


Additionally, underpinning can have positive environmental impacts by extending the life of existing buildings rather than necessitating new construction. This reduces waste and resource consumption associated with building demolition and new construction projects. From a community perspective, maintaining older structures through underpinning contributes to preserving historical architecture and neighborhood aesthetics, which can enhance local property values collectively.


Another indirect benefit relates to peace of mind for owners and occupants. Knowing that their home or business premises are structurally sound reduces stress and potential health issues related to constant worry over safety. This psychological well-being translates into productivity gains for businesses operating from these locations or improved quality of life for residents.


Calculating ROI for underpinning services therefore involves looking beyond mere cost recovery; it encompasses an appreciation in asset worth, avoidance of future expenses through proactive maintenance, operational flexibility due to structural reliability, environmental sustainability through conservation efforts, community enhancement via aesthetic continuity, and personal well-being from reduced anxiety about building stability. Each factor contributes uniquely but collectively they shape a robust case for why investing in underpinning isnt just about fixing foundations-its about securing future financial stability and lifestyle quality through comprehensive risk mitigation and enhancement strategies.

Material Procurement and Quality Control Procedures

Okay, so youre thinking about underpinning services, right? Maybe youre facing some foundation issues, and youre weighing up whether to bite the bullet and get them fixed. Its a big decision, and naturally, you want to know if its actually worth it. Thats where Return on Investment, or ROI, comes in. Its basically a way to figure out if the money you spend on underpinning is going to give you a good return.


Now, there isnt one single, magic formula for ROI on underpinning, because every situation is different. But we can look at some key factors. Think about the obvious costs first: the price of the underpinning work itself. Get several quotes and be sure they include everything – materials, labor, permits, any necessary inspections.


Then, consider the benefits. This is where it gets a little less straightforward. A big one is property value. A house with a solid foundation is worth more than one with cracks and sinking floors. Get a professional appraisal before and after the work to see the difference. This is a crucial part of your ROI calculation.


But its not just about the sale price down the line. Think about the ongoing costs you avoid by fixing the foundation. Are you currently spending money on temporary band-aids, like cosmetic repairs to hide cracks? Those costs vanish. Are you worried about further damage escalating, leading to even bigger (and more expensive) problems later? Underpinning can prevent that. Factor in the peace of mind, too – that's harder to quantify, but its real!


So, a simplified formula might look like this: (Increase in Property Value + Avoided Future Repair Costs) - Cost of Underpinning = Net Benefit. Then, divide the Net Benefit by the Cost of Underpinning and multiply by 100 to get your ROI percentage.


Remember, this is just a starting point. Talk to real estate professionals, contractors, and maybe even a financial advisor to get a clearer picture of the potential ROI in your specific situation. Dont just look at the immediate cost; think about the long-term value and the peace of mind that solid foundations bring. Good luck!

Material Procurement and Quality Control Procedures

Inspection and Testing Protocols During Foundation Repair

Okay, lets talk about Return on Investment (ROI) for underpinning services, but not in a dry, number-crunching way. Lets look at some real-world situations, because thats where the rubber actually meets the road, right?


Think about it. Underpinning, at its core, is about preventing a much bigger, more expensive disaster. Its like getting a root canal now to avoid losing the whole tooth later. So, how do you put a price on that peace of mind?


Let's say theres a historic building in a bustling city center. The foundation is starting to settle, causing cracks and instability. The owner could ignore it, hoping itll just...stop. But the risk? The building could become unsafe, tenants could leave (or sue!), and eventually, the whole structure could be condemned. Thats a huge loss – lost rental income, demolition costs, and potentially, a legal nightmare.


Instead, they invest in underpinning. Lets say it costs $50,000. That sounds like a lot initially. But consider this: The underpinning stabilizes the building, allowing them to keep their tenants and continue generating $100,000 in annual rental income. Plus, the value of the stabilized building is maintained. Without the underpinning, the buildings value would plummet. The ROI isnt just about immediate cash flow; its about preserving a valuable asset and avoiding catastrophic losses. That $50,000 looks a lot smarter now, doesnt it?


Another example: Imagine a homeowner notices cracks in their foundation. Theyre worried about further damage, water intrusion, and the potential impact on their homes resale value. They get quotes for underpinning and decide to proceed, spending $20,000. Before underpinning, the house might have been appraised at $300,000, but with the visible foundation issues, a buyer might offer significantly less, or even walk away. After underpinning, the structural integrity is restored, and the homes value is maintained, or even increased, because its now structurally sound. They can sell it for close to the original appraised value, avoiding a potential loss of tens of thousands of dollars. The ROI here is the difference between what they would have gotten without the underpinning versus what they got with it.


The key takeaway? ROI for underpinning isn't always a simple calculation. Its often about mitigating risk, preserving value, and avoiding potentially disastrous outcomes. You have to look at the bigger picture, consider the long-term impact, and factor in the intangible benefits, like peace of mind. Sometimes, the best ROI is the disaster that didnt happen.

Documentation and Reporting for Permitting Compliance and QA/QC

When considering the return on investment (ROI) for underpinning projects, several factors come into play that can significantly influence the financial outcome. Underpinning is a process used to strengthen and stabilize the foundation of a building, often necessary when structural issues arise or when additional construction is planned. Calculating the ROI for such services involves a nuanced understanding of various elements that can affect both costs and benefits.


First and foremost, the condition of the existing structure plays a critical role. If the building has severe foundational problems or if theres significant deterioration, the cost of underpinning can escalate rapidly. This might reduce ROI due to higher initial investment. Conversely, early intervention in less severe cases might yield a higher ROI by preventing more costly repairs down the line.


The method of underpinning chosen also impacts ROI. Traditional methods like mass concrete underpinning are generally less expensive but might not be as effective or quick as modern techniques such as resin injection or mini-piled underpinning. While these advanced methods can be costlier upfront, they often result in quicker project completion times and potentially lower long-term maintenance costs, thereby improving ROI through reduced downtime and extended structural longevity.


Another factor to consider is location. Properties in urban areas or regions with high real estate values might see a more substantial increase in property value post-underpinning, thus enhancing ROI. In contrast, rural or less valuable properties might not experience as significant an appreciation, affecting the investments attractiveness.


Regulatory compliance and local building codes can also sway ROI calculations. Stringent regulations might necessitate more comprehensive underpinning solutions or additional permits and inspections, increasing costs. However, ensuring compliance can add value by certifying the buildings safety and marketability.


Additionally, market conditions at the time of project completion are pivotal. A robust real estate market could mean a quicker sale or rental at a higher price post-underpinning, directly boosting ROI. On the flip side, during economic downturns or property market slumps, even well-executed underpinning projects might not yield expected returns due to decreased demand.


Lastly, future use intentions of the property influence ROI. If the underpinned structure is intended for long-term use by its owner, benefits like increased safety and comfort contribute to ROI through non-monetary gains over time. For investors looking to flip properties quickly after underpinning, however, immediate resale value becomes crucial.


In summary, calculating ROI for underpinning services requires a holistic view that considers not just direct financial metrics but also qualitative aspects like structural integrity improvements and market dynamics. Each projects unique circumstances dictate how these factors interplay to ultimately determine whether an investment in underpinning yields favorable returns.

Risk Management and Mitigation Strategies in Project Logistics

Lets be real, when we talk about investing in the stuff that keeps everything running smoothly – those underpinning services – its easy to get starry-eyed about potential ROI. We dream of fewer outages, happier customers, and a team thats actually, you know, productive. But before we sign off on that budget, we need to take a deep breath and talk about risk. Because ignoring the potential pitfalls is like building a house on sand.


Risk assessment and mitigation isnt just some corporate buzzword; its about being honest with ourselves about what could go wrong. What if that fancy new monitoring system turns out to be more complicated than we thought, requiring extra training and sucking up valuable time? What if the promised efficiency gains never materialize because of unforeseen compatibility issues? What if, dare I say it, we choose the wrong vendor and end up with a system thats actually worse than the one we had before?


A good risk assessment involves brainstorming all the potential downsides, from the obvious (cost overruns) to the less so (employee resistance to change). Once weve identified those risks, we need to figure out how likely they are to happen and how badly they would hurt us if they did. This lets us prioritize. We focus our energy on mitigating the high-probability, high-impact risks first.


Mitigation isnt about eliminating risk entirely – thats usually impossible. Its about reducing the likelihood or the impact. Maybe it means phasing in the new system instead of doing a full-blown overnight switch. Maybe it means investing in extra training and support for our team. Maybe it means having a backup plan in case the initial vendor doesnt deliver.


Thinking about risk upfront might seem like a downer, but its actually the key to a successful investment. It allows us to make informed decisions, adjust our expectations, and ultimately, increase the chances of seeing that sweet, sweet return on investment were all hoping for. So, before you get lost in the ROI calculations, take a moment to consider whats lurking in the shadows. Your future self will thank you.

Post-Repair Verification and Long-Term Monitoring for QA/QC

Lets talk about keeping your foundation solid, without always diving headfirst into underpinning. Its like deciding whether to get a root canal or try really, really hard with a good cleaning and some fluoride. Underpinning, thats the root canal – a big, sometimes necessary, but always impactful procedure. And just like with dental work, its worth exploring alternatives first.


So, what else is on the menu? Soil stabilization techniques are a big one. Think of things like injecting grout or expanding polymers into the ground around your foundation. This can help solidify loose or shifting soil, providing better support and preventing further settlement. Its less invasive than underpinning and often quicker, which translates to less disruption and lower initial costs. Another option, particularly for minor settlement issues, might be foundation crack repair. This involves sealing cracks in your foundation walls, preventing water intrusion and further degradation. It wont magically lift a sinking foundation, but it can stop the problem from worsening.


Now, lets get down to brass tacks: return on investment (ROI). When youre weighing up underpinning versus these alternatives, its not just about the upfront price tag. Underpinning, despite being pricier initially, can offer a higher ROI in certain situations. A significantly compromised foundation, left untreated, can lead to structural failure, property damage, and ultimately, a huge hit to your homes value. Underpinning, in this case, is an investment in preserving (or even increasing) your propertys worth.


On the other hand, if the problem is relatively minor, less invasive solutions might offer a better ROI. Spending a smaller amount on soil stabilization or crack repair can prevent further damage and maintain your property value without the hefty cost of underpinning.


Heres the key: its all about understanding the scope of the problem. Get a thorough assessment of your foundation issues from a qualified structural engineer. They can help you determine the root cause of the problem and recommend the most appropriate solution. Then, crunch the numbers. Consider the initial cost, the long-term impact on your property value, and the potential for future repairs. Only then can you truly calculate the ROI and make an informed decision that's right for your situation. Its not a one-size-fits-all answer; its about finding the solution thats the best fit for your foundation, and your wallet.

A wooden pier in Corfu, Greece

A pier is a raised structure that rises above a body of water and usually juts out from its shore, typically supported by piles or pillars, and provides above-water access to offshore areas. Frequent pier uses include fishing, boat docking and access for both passengers and cargo, and oceanside recreation. Bridges, buildings, and walkways may all be supported by architectural piers. Their open structure allows tides and currents to flow relatively unhindered, whereas the more solid foundations of a quay or the closely spaced piles of a wharf can act as a breakwater, and are consequently more liable to silting. Piers can range in size and complexity from a simple lightweight wooden structure to major structures extended over 1,600 m (5,200 ft). In American English, a pier may be synonymous with a dock.

Piers have been built for several purposes, and because these different purposes have distinct regional variances, the term pier tends to have different nuances of meaning in different parts of the world. Thus in North America and Australia, where many ports were, until recently, built on the multiple pier model, the term tends to imply a current or former cargo-handling facility. In contrast, in Europe, where ports more often use basins and river-side quays than piers, the term is principally associated with the image of a Victorian cast iron pleasure pier which emerged in Great Britain during the early 19th century. However, the earliest piers pre-date the Victorian age.

Types

[edit]

Piers can be categorized into different groupings according to the principal purpose.[1] However, there is considerable overlap between these categories. For example, pleasure piers often also allow for the docking of pleasure steamers and other similar craft, while working piers have often been converted to leisure use after being rendered obsolete by advanced developments in cargo-handling technology. Many piers are floating piers, to ensure that the piers raise and lower with the tide along with the boats tied to them. This prevents a situation where lines become overly taut or loose by rising or lowering tides. An overly taut or loose tie-line can damage boats by pulling them out of the water or allowing them so much leeway that they bang forcefully against the sides of the pier.

Working piers

[edit]
Out-of-use industrial bulk cargo Pier, Cook Inlet, Alaska.

Working piers were built for the handling of passengers and cargo onto and off ships or (as at Wigan Pier) canal boats. Working piers themselves fall into two different groups. Longer individual piers are often found at ports with large tidal ranges, with the pier stretching far enough off shore to reach deep water at low tide. Such piers provided an economical alternative to impounded docks where cargo volumes were low, or where specialist bulk cargo was handled, such as at coal piers. The other form of working pier, often called the finger pier, was built at ports with smaller tidal ranges. Here the principal advantage was to give a greater available quay length for ships to berth against compared to a linear littoral quayside, and such piers are usually much shorter. Typically each pier would carry a single transit shed the length of the pier, with ships berthing bow or stern in to the shore. Some major ports consisted of large numbers of such piers lining the foreshore, classic examples being the Hudson River frontage of New York, or the Embarcadero in San Francisco.

The advent of container shipping, with its need for large container handling spaces adjacent to the shipping berths, has made working piers obsolete for the handling of general cargo, although some still survive for the handling of passenger ships or bulk cargos. One example, is in use in Progreso, Yucatán, where a pier extends more than 4 miles into the Gulf of Mexico, making it the longest pier in the world. The Progreso Pier supplies much of the peninsula with transportation for the fishing and cargo industries and serves as a port for large cruise ships in the area. Many other working piers have been demolished, or remain derelict, but some have been recycled as pleasure piers. The best known example of this is Pier 39 in San Francisco.

At Southport and the Tweed River on the Gold Coast in Australia, there are piers that support equipment for a sand bypassing system that maintains the health of sandy beaches and navigation channels.

Pleasure piers

[edit]
Print of a Victorian pier in Margate in the English county of Kent, 1897

Pleasure piers were first built in Britain during the early 19th century.[2] The earliest structures were Ryde Pier, built in 1813/4, Trinity Chain Pier near Leith, built in 1821, Brighton Chain Pier, built in 1823.[2] and Margate Jetty 1823/24 originally a timber built pier.

Only the oldest of these piers still remains. At that time, the introduction of steamships and railways for the first time permitted mass tourism to dedicated seaside resorts. The large tidal ranges at many such resorts meant that passengers arriving by pleasure steamer could use a pier to disembark safely.[3] Also, for much of the day, the sea was not visible from the shore and the pleasure pier permitted holidaymakers to promenade over and alongside the sea at all times.[4] The world's longest pleasure pier is at Southend-on-Sea, Essex, and extends 1.3 miles (2.1 km) into the Thames Estuary.[2] The longest pier on the West Coast of the US is the Santa Cruz Wharf, with a length of 2,745 feet (837 m).[5]

Providing a walkway out to sea, pleasure piers often include amusements and theatres as part of their attractions.[4] Such a pier may be unroofed, closed, or partly open and partly closed. Sometimes a pier has two decks. Galveston Island Historic Pleasure Pier in Galveston, Texas has a roller coaster, 15 rides, carnival games and souvenir shops.[6]

Early pleasure piers were of complete timber construction, as was with Margate which opened in 1824. The first iron and timber built pleasure pier Margate Jetty, opened in 1855.[7] Margate pier was wrecked by a storm in January 1978 and not repaired.[8][7] The longest iron pleasure pier still remaining is the one at Southend. First opened as a wooden pier in 1829, it was reconstructed in iron and completed in 1889. In a 2006 UK poll, the public voted the seaside pier onto the list of icons of England.[9]

Fishing piers

[edit]

Many piers are built for the purpose of providing boatless anglers access to fishing grounds that are otherwise inaccessible.[10] Many "Free Piers" are available in larger harbors which differ from private piers. Free Piers are often primarily used for fishing. Fishing from a pier presents a set of different circumstances to fishing from the shore or beach, as you do not need to cast out into the deeper water. This being the case there are specific fishing rigs that have been created specifically for pier fishing[11] which allow for the direct access to deeper water.

Piers of the world

[edit]

Belgium

[edit]

In Blankenberge a first pleasure pier was built in 1894. After its destruction in the World War I, a new pier was built in 1933. It remained till the present day, but was partially transformed and modernized in 1999–2004.

In Nieuwpoort, Belgium there is a pleasure pier on both sides of the river IJzer.

Netherlands

[edit]
The Scheveningen Pier

Scheveningen, the coastal resort town of The Hague, boasts the largest pier in the Netherlands, completed in 1961. A crane, built on top of the pier's panorama tower, provides the opportunity to make a 60-metre (200 ft) high bungee jump over the North Sea waves. The present pier is a successor of an earlier pier, which was completed in 1901 but in 1943 destroyed by the German occupation forces.

United Kingdom

[edit]

England and Wales

[edit]

The first recorded pier in England was Ryde Pier, opened in 1814 on the Isle of Wight, as a landing stage to allow ferries to and from the mainland to berth. It is still used for this purpose today.[12] It also had a leisure function in the past, with the pier head once containing a pavilion, and there are still refreshment facilities today. The oldest cast iron pier in the world is Town Pier, Gravesend, in Kent, which opened in 1834. However, it is not recognised by the National Piers Society as being a seaside pier.[13]

Brighton Palace Pier (pictured in 2011), opened in 1899

Following the building of the world's first seaside pier at Ryde, the pier became fashionable at seaside resorts in England and Wales during the Victorian era, peaking in the 1860s with 22 being built in that decade.[14] A symbol of the typical British seaside holiday, by 1914, more than 100 pleasure piers were located around the UK coast.[2] Regarded as being among the finest Victorian architecture, there are still a significant number of seaside piers of architectural merit still standing, although some have been lost, including Margate, two at Brighton in East Sussex, one at New Brighton in the Wirral and three at Blackpool in Lancashire.[4] Two piers, Brighton's now derelict West Pier and Clevedon Pier, were Grade 1 listed. The Birnbeck Pier in Weston-super-Mare is the only pier in the world linked to an island. The National Piers Society gives a figure of 55 surviving seaside piers in England and Wales.[1] In 2017, Brighton Palace Pier was said to be the most visited tourist attraction outside London, with over 4.5 million visitors the previous year.[15]

See also

[edit]
  • Boardwalk
  • Breakwater
  • Dock
  • Jetty
  • List of piers
  • Seaside resort
  • Wharf

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Piers". National Piers Society. 2006. Archived from the original on September 29, 2008. Retrieved February 24, 2012.
  2. ^ a b c d "The expert selection: British seaside piers". No. 1 August 2014. Financial Times. 15 June 2015. Archived from the original on 2022-12-10.
  3. ^ Gladwell, Andrew (2015). "Introduction". London's Pleasure Steamers. Amberley Publishing. ISBN 978-1445641584.
  4. ^ a b c "A very British affair - the fall and rise of the seaside pier". BBC News. 16 June 2015.
  5. ^ "California Pier Statistics, Longest Piers". seecalifornia.com. Retrieved 2014-02-10.
  6. ^ Aulds, T.J. (January 28, 2012). "Landry's Corp. is close to revealing plans". News Article. Galveston Daily News. Archived from the original on January 31, 2012.
  7. ^ a b "200 years of historic British piers: in pictures". The Telegraph. Retrieved 15 June 2015
  8. ^ "The destruction of Margate jetty in the great storm of January 1978". 13 January 2018.
  9. ^ "ICONS of England - the 100 ICONS as voted by the public". Culture 24 News. 15 June 2015.
  10. ^ "Landscape Design Book" (PDF). University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point. 2013. Retrieved January 6, 2015.[permanent dead link]
  11. ^ VS, Marco (2021-03-21). "Pier Fishing Rigs: 6 Common Types of Rigs for fishing from a Pier". Pro Fishing Reviews. Retrieved 2021-10-10.
  12. ^ "Britain's best seaside piers". The Telegraph. Retrieved 15 June 2015
  13. ^ "The oldest surviving cast iron pier in the world". BBC. February 9, 2006. Retrieved March 26, 2006.
  14. ^ Dobraszczyk, Paul (2014). Iron, Ornament and Architecture in Victorian Britain: Myth and Modernity, Excess and Enchantment. Ashgate Publishing. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-472-41898-2.
  15. ^ "Brighton Palace Pier named as Britain's most visited tourist attraction outside London". Brighton and Hove News. 2 August 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2025.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Turner, K., (1999), Pier Railways and Tramways of the British Isles, The Oakwood Press, No. LP60, ISBN 0-85361-541-1.
  • Wills, Anthony; Phillips, Tim (2014). British Seaside Piers. London: English Heritage. ISBN 9781848022645.
[edit]
  • The Piers Project
  • National Piers Society
  • Details on UK Piers including Webcams

 

Shallow foundation construction example

A shallow foundation is a type of building foundation that transfers structural load to the Earth very near to the surface, rather than to a subsurface layer or a range of depths, as does a deep foundation. Customarily, a shallow foundation is considered as such when the width of the entire foundation is greater than its depth.[1] In comparison to deep foundations, shallow foundations are less technical, thus making them more economical and the most widely used for relatively light structures.

Types

[edit]

Footings are always wider than the members that they support. Structural loads from a column or wall are usually greater than 1,000 kPa, while the soil's bearing capacity is commonly less than that (typically less than 400 kPa). By possessing a larger bearing area, the foundation distributes the pressure to the soil, decreasing the bearing pressure to within allowable values.[2] A structure is not limited to one footing. Multiple types of footings may be used in a construction project.

Wall footing

[edit]

Also called strip footing, a wall footing is a continuous strip that supports structural and non-structural load-bearing walls. Found directly under the wall, Its width is commonly 2-3 times wider than the wall above it.[3]

Detail Section of a strip footing and its wall.

Isolated footing

[edit]

Also called single-column footing, an isolated footing is a square, rectangular, or circular slab that supports the structural members individually. Generally, each column is set on an individual footing to transmit and distribute the load of the structure to the soil underneath. Sometimes, an isolated footing can be sloped or stepped at the base to spread greater loads. This type of footing is used when the structural load is relatively low, columns are widely spaced, and the soil's bearing capacity is adequate at a shallow depth.

Combined footing

[edit]

When more than one column shares the same footing, it is called a combined footing. A combined footing is typically utilized when the spacing of the columns is too restricted such that if isolated footing were used, they would overlap one another. Also, when property lines make isolated footings eccentrically loaded, combined footings are preferred.

When the load among the columns is equal, the combined footing may be rectangular. Conversely, when the load among the columns is unequal, the combined footing should be trapezoidal.

Strap footing

[edit]

A strap footing connects individual columns with the use of a strap beam. The general purpose of a strap footing is alike to those of a combined footing, where the spacing is possibly limited and/or the columns are adjacent to the property lines.

Mat foundation with its concrete undergoing curing.

Mat foundation

[edit]

Also called raft foundation, a mat foundation is a single continuous slab that covers the entirety of the base of a building. Mat foundations support all the loads of the structure and transmit them to the ground evenly. Soil conditions may prevent other footings from being used. Since this type of foundation distributes the load coming from the building uniformly over a considerably large area, it is favored when individual footings are unfeasible due to the low bearing capacity of the soil.

Diagrams of the types of shallow foundations.

Slab-on-grade foundation

[edit]
Pouring a slab-on-grade foundation

Slab-on-grade or floating slab foundations are a structural engineering practice whereby the reinforced concrete slab that is to serve as the foundation for the structure is formed from formwork set into the ground. The concrete is then poured into the formwork, leaving no space between the ground and the structure. This type of construction is most often seen in warmer climates, where ground freezing and thawing is less of a concern and where there is no need for heat ducting underneath the floor. Frost Protected Shallow Foundations (or FPSF) which are used in areas of potential frost heave, are a form of slab-on-grade foundation.[4]

Remodeling or extending such a structure may be more difficult. Over the long term, ground settling (or subsidence) may be a problem, as a slab foundation cannot be readily jacked up to compensate; proper soil compaction prior to pour can minimize this. The slab can be decoupled from ground temperatures by insulation, with the concrete poured directly over insulation (for example, extruded polystyrene foam panels), or heating provisions (such as hydronic heating) can be built into the slab.

Slab-on-grade foundations should not be used in areas with expansive clay soil. While elevated structural slabs actually perform better on expansive clays, it is generally accepted by the engineering community that slab-on-grade foundations offer the greatest cost-to-performance ratio for tract homes. Elevated structural slabs are generally only found on custom homes or homes with basements.

Copper piping, commonly used to carry natural gas and water, reacts with concrete over a long period, slowly degrading until the pipe fails. This can lead to what is commonly referred to as slab leaks. These occur when pipes begin to leak from within the slab. Signs of a slab leak range from unexplained dampened carpet spots, to drops in water pressure and wet discoloration on exterior foundation walls.[5] Copper pipes must be lagged (that is, insulated) or run through a conduit or plumbed into the building above the slab. Electrical conduits through the slab must be water-tight, as they extend below ground level and can potentially expose wiring to groundwater.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Akhter, Shahin. "Shallow foundation – Definition, Types, Uses and Diagrams". Pro Civil Engineer. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  2. ^ Gillesania, Diego Inocencio T. (2004). Fundamentals of reinforced concrete design (2nd ed.). [Cebu, Cirty, Philippines]. p. 259. ISBN 971-8614-26-5. OCLC 1015901733.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  3. ^ Mahdi, Sheikh. "8 Most Important Types of Foundation". civiltoday.com. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  4. ^ "Slab-on-Grade Foundation Detail & Insulation, Building Guide".
  5. ^ "Slab Leak Repair McKinney, Frisco, and Allen Tx - Hackler Plumbing". Hacklerplumbingmckinney.com. 2013-11-08. Retrieved 2018-08-20.
[edit]

About Cook County

Driving Directions in Cook County


Driving Directions From 42.088525008778, -88.079435634324 to
Driving Directions From 42.021124436568, -88.109125186152 to
Driving Directions From 42.017845685371, -88.11591807218 to
Driving Directions From 42.084324223519, -88.137710099374 to
Driving Directions From 42.10843482977, -88.114090738222 to
Driving Directions From 42.086153671225, -88.19640031169 to
Driving Directions From 42.051159627372, -88.202951526236 to
Driving Directions From 42.008657936699, -88.152725208607 to
Driving Directions From 42.007242948498, -88.153060682778 to
Driving Directions From 42.073881347839, -88.179224443136 to