Impact of Material Choice on Overall Project Cost

Impact of Material Choice on Overall Project Cost

Project Scope Definition and Permitting Requirements for Foundation Repair

Understanding foundation repair methods and the variety of material options available is crucial when considering the impact of material choice on the overall project cost. Foundation repair can be a significant investment, and the materials chosen not only affect the durability and longevity of the repair but also play a pivotal role in determining how much youll spend.


Those windows that suddenly won't close properly aren't rebelling against you but rather responding to the foundation shift tango water intrusion prevention McHenry County Cherry Hill.

When it comes to foundation repair, common methods include slabjacking, piering, wall anchors, and mudjacking, each with its set of suitable materials. For instance, steel piers are often used for their strength and longevity in piering projects. They are more expensive upfront compared to concrete piers but offer superior load-bearing capacity and resistance to environmental factors like soil movement or water damage, which can reduce long-term maintenance costs.


Concrete is another widely used material, particularly in slabjacking where polyurethane foam or cement-based grouts lift and stabilize the foundation. While concrete is generally less costly than steel, its effectiveness can vary based on soil conditions. In areas prone to moisture changes or expansive soils, choosing high-quality cementitious materials might increase initial costs but prevent future issues like cracking or shifting.


The choice between polymer-based products like epoxy or polyurethane versus traditional materials like concrete also influences cost. Polymers are praised for their quick curing times and minimal disruption during application, which can lower labor costs. However, these materials tend to be pricier per unit than conventional options.


Moreover, local availability impacts cost significantly. Materials that need to be imported or are less common in a region will naturally escalate expenses due to transportation and scarcity premiums. On the flip side, locally sourced materials might not only be cheaper but also support local economies.


In essence, while cheaper materials might seem appealing initially for keeping project costs down, they could lead to higher expenses over time due to repairs or replacements if they fail prematurely under stress or environmental changes. Conversely, investing in high-quality materials might increase upfront costs but can provide peace of mind through enhanced performance and reduced need for future interventions. Therefore, when planning foundation repairs, homeowners should weigh both immediate financial implications against long-term value and sustainability offered by different material choices. This balanced approach ensures that decisions made today do not become costly regrets tomorrow.

When embarking on a foundation repair project, one of the critical factors influencing the overall cost is the choice of materials. The cost analysis of common foundation repair materials not only sheds light on direct expenses but also impacts the longevity, maintenance, and eventual value of the repair work. This essay explores how different material choices affect project costs in foundation repairs.


Firstly, lets consider concrete, one of the most traditional materials used in foundation repairs due to its durability and strength. While concrete might initially seem like a cost-effective option because of its widespread availability and lower unit cost, it requires significant labor for preparation and installation. Additionally, if high-quality concrete is not used, or if there are flaws in the mix or curing process, it can lead to future issues requiring additional expenditure for repairs or replacements.


Steel reinforcement, often used in conjunction with concrete to enhance tensile strength, introduces another layer of cost consideration. While steel adds to the upfront costs due to its price per unit and specialized labor needed for proper installation, it significantly reduces long-term expenses by providing additional structural integrity. This can prevent costly future repairs that might arise from settling or shifting foundations.


For those looking into more modern solutions, fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) present an interesting alternative. FRPs are lighter than traditional materials like steel and concrete yet offer impressive strength-to-weight ratios. However, their initial cost is considerably higher than conventional options due to both material expense and the need for skilled technicians to apply them correctly. Yet, this investment could pay off through reduced transportation costs during delivery and potentially fewer workers needed on-site due to ease of handling.


Another material gaining traction is helical piers or piles made from galvanized steel. These are particularly useful in areas with poor soil conditions where traditional methods might fail prematurely. Although more expensive upfront than simple concrete footings due to manufacturing complexity and installation precision required by professionals equipped with hydraulic machinery, they provide a long-lasting solution that often negates the need for repeated interventions.


In analyzing these materials impact on project costs, its essential to consider not just immediate financial outlays but also lifecycle costs including maintenance and potential replacement frequency. For instance, although steel might increase initial costs when added to concrete foundations, its contribution towards reducing future maintenance significantly impacts overall project economics positively over time.


In conclusion, while each material presents different initial costs associated with procurement and installation complexity, their selection should be guided by a comprehensive view that includes durability against environmental factors like soil movement or moisture content changes which could escalate repair costs over time if not adequately addressed at the outset. Therefore, when planning foundation repairs, homeowners or contractors must weigh these factors meticulously; choosing wisely between immediate affordability versus long-term value preservation can dramatically influence both current budgets and future financial commitments related to property upkeep.

Material Procurement and Quality Control Procedures

When considering the impact of material choice on overall project costs, one critical aspect to examine is the durability and longevity of the materials used. The initial cost of materials can often be misleading; while cheaper options might seem attractive at first glance, they can lead to significantly higher expenses over time if they lack durability.


Materials that endure over long periods reduce the frequency of replacements and repairs, which are costly both in terms of direct expenses and indirect costs such as downtime or disruption to operations. For instance, opting for high-quality steel or concrete in construction projects might increase upfront costs but will likely decrease maintenance needs. These materials resist weathering, corrosion, and structural degradation better than their less durable counterparts, leading to fewer interventions over the buildings lifespan.


Moreover, durable materials often contribute to energy efficiency. For example, well-insulated materials like certain types of glass or advanced roofing systems not only last longer but also improve a buildings thermal performance, reducing heating and cooling costs. This aspect becomes increasingly important in an era where sustainability is not just an environmental concern but also a financial one.


In contrast, choosing less durable materials might save money initially but can result in a cycle of frequent replacements. This cycle increases labor costs, material procurement overheads, and potential losses from operational interruptions. Additionally, the environmental impact of frequent material turnover should not be underestimated; sustainable practices are increasingly valued by consumers and stakeholders alike, which indirectly affects a projects reputation and marketability.


In summary, while the initial investment in durable materials might seem high, their longevity directly impacts long-term cost efficiency by minimizing repair needs and enhancing operational continuity. Therefore, when planning projects with a focus on cost-effectiveness over time, prioritizing material durability is not just prudent but essential for achieving true economic value alongside environmental responsibility.

Material Procurement and Quality Control Procedures

Inspection and Testing Protocols During Foundation Repair

When considering the impact of material choice on the overall project cost, one critical factor often overlooked is the labor costs associated with different material applications. The selection of materials not only affects the direct expenses like purchasing and transportation but also significantly influences the labor intensity required for installation, maintenance, and potential repairs.


For instance, consider a construction project where one might choose between traditional brickwork and modern composite panels. Bricklaying is a labor-intensive process, requiring skilled masons who take considerable time to lay bricks accurately, especially in complex architectural designs. This can lead to higher labor costs due to both the time involved and the specialized skills needed. On the other hand, composite panels might offer a quicker installation process; they are often pre-fabricated to specific dimensions, reducing on-site labor requirements. However, this efficiency might come at a higher initial material cost or require specialized equipment or training for workers, which could balance out or even exceed savings from reduced labor time.


Similarly, in interior design projects, choosing between hardwood flooring and laminate can have stark differences in labor costs. Hardwood requires meticulous laying by experienced carpenters to ensure a perfect fit and finish, involving cutting around obstacles like door frames or heating vents. Laminate flooring might be less expensive initially but can be installed by less skilled laborers since it typically involves click-lock systems that simplify the process.


Moreover, maintenance plays a role as well. Materials like stainless steel in industrial settings are durable but might demand periodic polishing by professionals to maintain their appearance and functionality. In contrast, materials like certain polymers might degrade faster under similar conditions but require less intensive upkeep once installed.


In summary, when planning a projects budget, its essential to look beyond just the upfront costs of materials. Labor costs associated with different material applications can significantly sway the total expenditure. A comprehensive analysis should include not just installation but also potential future maintenance or repair work influenced by material durability and ease of service. This holistic approach ensures that decisions made early on regarding material choice do not unexpectedly inflate project costs down the line through unforeseen labor demands.

Documentation and Reporting for Permitting Compliance and QA/QC

Okay, lets talk about how the materials we pick for foundation repair can really impact the final bill, specifically when it comes to getting those materials and hauling them around. Think about it: the cost of concrete versus, say, carbon fiber straps isnt just about the price tag on the material itself. Its about everything it takes to get that stuff onto the job site and ready to use.


Material availability is a huge factor. If youre in a rural area and need a specialized epoxy only available from a distributor three states over, well, thats going to add up. Lead times matter too. A material that takes weeks to arrive can delay the whole project, potentially increasing labor costs and even inconveniencing the homeowner. Compare that to something readily available at the local hardware store; the difference can be significant.


Then theres the transportation itself. Concrete is heavy. Really heavy. Getting it to the site requires specialized trucks and maybe even pumping equipment. That all costs money. Lighter materials, like those carbon fiber solutions, are much easier and cheaper to transport. Plus, consider the fuel costs, especially with fluctuating gas prices. A project requiring multiple truckloads of concrete will naturally rack up a higher transportation expense than one using materials that can be delivered in a single van.


So, when youre looking at foundation repair options, dont just focus on the material cost per unit. Think about the bigger picture: Where does this stuff come from? How easily can it be obtained? And whats it going to cost to get it here? These factors can significantly influence the overall project cost and should definitely be part of the decision-making process.

Risk Management and Mitigation Strategies in Project Logistics

When embarking on a construction or manufacturing project, one of the most critical decisions revolves around the selection of materials. This choice significantly influences the overall project cost, not merely through the direct expense of purchasing materials but also through how well these materials meet project-specific requirements. Comparing material costs with project-specific needs is therefore an exercise in balancing economic considerations with functional and aesthetic demands.


At first glance, opting for cheaper materials might seem like a straightforward way to reduce expenses. However, this approach can be shortsighted. For instance, if a project requires durability due to environmental exposure or heavy usage, low-cost materials might not only fail prematurely but also increase maintenance or replacement costs over time. Here, comparing the initial cost against long-term value becomes crucial. A higher upfront investment in a more durable material could lead to savings by reducing the frequency of repairs or replacements.


Moreover, project-specific requirements often include factors like thermal insulation, soundproofing, fire resistance, or aesthetic appeal. Each material has its own set of properties; for example, steel offers strength and fire resistance but might not provide the best thermal insulation compared to certain composites or insulative foams. By analyzing how each materials properties align with these specific needs, project managers can make informed decisions that prevent costly modifications later in the project lifecycle.


Additionally, sustainability has become a non-negotiable aspect in modern projects. Materials that are eco-friendly might carry a higher price tag initially but can qualify for green building certifications or tax incentives which offset costs. They also appeal to environmentally conscious stakeholders and can enhance a projects marketability or public perception.


In practice, this comparison involves detailed analysis: sourcing quotes from suppliers, reviewing case studies where similar choices were made in comparable projects, and sometimes even conducting small-scale tests or simulations to predict performance under expected conditions. This meticulous process ensures that when materials are selected, they are not just cost-effective at purchase but truly economical throughout the life of the project.


In conclusion, comparing material costs with project-specific requirements goes beyond simple arithmetic; its about understanding the broader implications of each choice on cost efficiency over time. Effective decision-making here requires foresight into how each material will serve within its intended application environment while keeping an eye on budget constraints and long-term financial impacts. This holistic approach ensures that projects remain financially viable while meeting all specified performance criteria.

Post-Repair Verification and Long-Term Monitoring for QA/QC

In the realm of foundation repair, the choice of materials significantly influences the overall project cost, a fact well-illustrated by various case studies. These studies highlight how different materials not only affect the durability and longevity of the repair but also have a direct impact on the financial aspect of projects.


One compelling case involved a residential building in a region prone to soil expansion and contraction. Initially, the project opted for traditional concrete piers due to their proven strength and local availability. However, while concrete is relatively cost-effective in terms of initial investment, it requires substantial labor and time for installation, which increased the projects indirect costs like labor and equipment rental. The total expenditure escalated unexpectedly, prompting a reevaluation.


In contrast, another project in a similar geological setting chose to use steel push piers. Steel, although more expensive per unit than concrete, offered quicker installation times due to its lighter weight and ease of handling. This reduction in installation time directly translated into lower labor costs and reduced project duration, thereby decreasing overall expenses despite the higher material cost. Additionally, steel piers provided enhanced load-bearing capacity with less material volume, further optimizing cost efficiency.


A third case study focused on a commercial property where engineers decided on composite materials for foundation repair. Composites like fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) are at the higher end of the cost spectrum initially but offer superior resistance to environmental factors like moisture and chemical degradation. Over time, this choice proved economical as it minimized maintenance costs and extended the lifespan of the repair work significantly beyond what traditional materials might achieve.


These examples underscore that while material costs are a direct expense in foundation repair projects, they must be considered within a broader context that includes installation efficiency, durability against local conditions, and long-term maintenance requirements. Each material brings its own set of advantages and challenges; thus, selecting the right one involves balancing immediate financial outlays with long-term savings. The key takeaway from these case studies is that an informed decision on material choice can lead to substantial savings or unexpected overruns depending on how well these factors are evaluated before project commencement. This strategic approach ensures not only structural integrity but also financial prudence in foundation repair initiatives.

Waterproofing is the procedure of making a things, person or framework waterproof or waterproof to ensure that it stays relatively unaffected by water or withstands the access of water under specified conditions. Such things might be utilized in wet environments or underwater to specified midsts. Water-resistant and water-proof often describe resistance to penetration of water in its liquid state and potentially under pressure, whereas moist evidence describes resistance to humidity or moisture. Permeation of water vapour through a product or structure is reported as a moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR). The hulls of boats and ships were when waterproofed by using tar or pitch. Modern items may be waterproofed by using water-repellent finishes or by securing seams with gaskets or o-rings. Waterproofing is used of developing structures (such as basements, decks, or damp areas), boat, canvas, apparel (raincoats or waders), electronic devices and paper packaging (such as containers for fluids).

.

Soil mechanics is a branch of dirt physics and used mechanics that describes the behavior of soils. It differs from liquid mechanics and strong auto mechanics in the feeling that soils consist of a heterogeneous blend of fluids (generally air and water) and particles (normally clay, silt, sand, and crushed rock) yet soil may likewise have organic solids and various other matter. Together with rock mechanics, soil auto mechanics supplies the academic basis for analysis in geotechnical engineering, a subdiscipline of civil design, and engineering geology, a subdiscipline of geology. Dirt technicians is utilized to evaluate the deformations of and flow of fluids within all-natural and manufactured frameworks that are supported on or made from dirt, or structures that are buried in soils. Instance applications are developing and bridge structures, maintaining walls, dams, and hidden pipe systems. Concepts of soil technicians are also made use of in associated techniques such as geophysical design, seaside design, farming engineering, and hydrology. This post defines the genesis and structure of soil, the difference in between pore water pressure and inter-granular efficient tension, capillary activity of fluids in the dirt pore areas, dirt classification, infiltration and permeability, time dependent adjustment of quantity due to pressing water out of little pore rooms, likewise called combination, shear stamina and rigidity of soils. The shear strength of soils is mostly stemmed from rubbing between the particles and interlocking, which are extremely sensitive to the efficient anxiety. The post ends with some examples of applications of the principles of dirt mechanics such as slope stability, side earth pressure on retaining walls, and bearing ability of foundations.

.
Drilling of deep piles of diameter 150 cm in bridge 423 near Ness Ziona, Israel

 

A deep foundation installation for a bridge in Napa, California, United States.
Pile driving operations in the Port of Tampa, Florida.

A pile or piling is a vertical structural element of a deep foundation, driven or drilled deep into the ground at the building site. A deep foundation is a type of foundation that transfers building loads to the earth farther down from the surface than a shallow foundation does to a subsurface layer or a range of depths.

Deep foundations of The Marina Torch, a skyscraper in Dubai

There are many reasons that a geotechnical engineer would recommend a deep foundation over a shallow foundation, such as for a skyscraper. Some of the common reasons are very large design loads, a poor soil at shallow depth, or site constraints like property lines. There are different terms used to describe different types of deep foundations including the pile (which is analogous to a pole), the pier (which is analogous to a column), drilled shafts, and caissons. Piles are generally driven into the ground in situ; other deep foundations are typically put in place using excavation and drilling. The naming conventions may vary between engineering disciplines and firms. Deep foundations can be made out of timber, steel, reinforced concrete or prestressed concrete.

Driven foundations

[edit]
Pipe piles being driven into the ground
Illustration of a hand-operated pile driver in Germany after 1480

Prefabricated piles are driven into the ground using a pile driver. Driven piles are constructed of wood, reinforced concrete, or steel. Wooden piles are made from the trunks of tall trees. Concrete piles are available in square, octagonal, and round cross-sections (like Franki piles). They are reinforced with rebar and are often prestressed. Steel piles are either pipe piles or some sort of beam section (like an H-pile). Historically, wood piles used splices to join multiple segments end-to-end when the driven depth required was too long for a single pile; today, splicing is common with steel piles, though concrete piles can be spliced with mechanical and other means. Driving piles, as opposed to drilling shafts, is advantageous because the soil displaced by driving the piles compresses the surrounding soil, causing greater friction against the sides of the piles, thus increasing their load-bearing capacity. Driven piles are also considered to be "tested" for weight-bearing ability because of their method of installation.[citation needed]

Pile foundation systems

[edit]

Foundations relying on driven piles often have groups of piles connected by a pile cap (a large concrete block into which the heads of the piles are embedded) to distribute loads that are greater than one pile can bear. Pile caps and isolated piles are typically connected with grade beams to tie the foundation elements together; lighter structural elements bear on the grade beams, while heavier elements bear directly on the pile cap.[citation needed]

Monopile foundation

[edit]

A monopile foundation utilizes a single, generally large-diameter, foundation structural element to support all the loads (weight, wind, etc.) of a large above-surface structure.

A large number of monopile foundations[1] have been utilized in recent years for economically constructing fixed-bottom offshore wind farms in shallow-water subsea locations.[2] For example, the Horns Rev wind farm in the North Sea west of Denmark utilizes 80 large monopiles of 4 metres diameter sunk 25 meters deep into the seabed,[3] while the Lynn and Inner Dowsing Wind Farm off the coast of England went online in 2008 with over 100 turbines, each mounted on a 4.7-metre-diameter monopile foundation in ocean depths up to 18 metres.[4]

The typical construction process for a wind turbine subsea monopile foundation in sand includes driving a large hollow steel pile, of some 4 m in diameter with approximately 50mm thick walls, some 25 m deep into the seabed, through a 0.5 m layer of larger stone and gravel to minimize erosion around the pile. A transition piece (complete with pre-installed features such as boat-landing arrangement, cathodic protection, cable ducts for sub-marine cables, turbine tower flange, etc.) is attached to the driven pile, and the sand and water are removed from the centre of the pile and replaced with concrete. An additional layer of even larger stone, up to 0.5 m diameter, is applied to the surface of the seabed for longer-term erosion protection.[2]

Drilled piles

[edit]
A pile machine in Amsterdam.

Also called caissons, drilled shafts, drilled piers, cast-in-drilled-hole piles (CIDH piles) or cast-in-situ piles, a borehole is drilled into the ground, then concrete (and often some sort of reinforcing) is placed into the borehole to form the pile. Rotary boring techniques allow larger diameter piles than any other piling method and permit pile construction through particularly dense or hard strata. Construction methods depend on the geology of the site; in particular, whether boring is to be undertaken in 'dry' ground conditions or through water-saturated strata. Casing is often used when the sides of the borehole are likely to slough off before concrete is poured.

For end-bearing piles, drilling continues until the borehole has extended a sufficient depth (socketing) into a sufficiently strong layer. Depending on site geology, this can be a rock layer, or hardpan, or other dense, strong layers. Both the diameter of the pile and the depth of the pile are highly specific to the ground conditions, loading conditions, and nature of the project. Pile depths may vary substantially across a project if the bearing layer is not level. Drilled piles can be tested using a variety of methods to verify the pile integrity during installation.

Under-reamed piles

[edit]

Under-reamed piles have mechanically formed enlarged bases that are as much as 6 m in diameter.[citation needed] The form is that of an inverted cone and can only be formed in stable soils or rocks. The larger base diameter allows greater bearing capacity than a straight-shaft pile.

These piles are suited for expansive soils which are often subjected to seasonal moisture variations, or for loose or soft strata. They are used in normal ground condition also where economics are favorable. [5][full citation needed]

Under reamed piles foundation is used for the following soils:-

1. Under reamed piles are used in black cotton soil: This type of soil expands when it comes in contact with water and contraction occurs when water is removed. So that cracks appear in the construction done on such clay. An under reamed pile is used in the base to remove this defect.

2. Under reamed piles are used in low bearing capacity Outdated soil (filled soil)

3.Under reamed piles are used in sandy soil when water table is high.

4. Under reamed piles are used, Where lifting forces appear at the base of foundation.

Augercast pile

[edit]

An augercast pile, often known as a continuous flight augering (CFA) pile, is formed by drilling into the ground with a hollow stemmed continuous flight auger to the required depth or degree of resistance. No casing is required. A cement grout mix is then pumped down the stem of the auger. While the cement grout is pumped, the auger is slowly withdrawn, conveying the soil upward along the flights. A shaft of fluid cement grout is formed to ground level. Reinforcement can be installed. Recent innovations in addition to stringent quality control allows reinforcing cages to be placed up to the full length of a pile when required.[citation needed]

Augercast piles cause minimal disturbance and are often used for noise-sensitive and environmentally-sensitive sites. Augercast piles are not generally suited for use in contaminated soils, because of expensive waste disposal costs. In cases such as these, a displacement pile (like Olivier piles) may provide the cost efficiency of an augercast pile and minimal environmental impact. In ground containing obstructions or cobbles and boulders, augercast piles are less suitable as refusal above the design pile tip elevation may be encountered.[citation needed]

Small Sectional Flight Auger piling rigs can also be used for piled raft foundations. These produce the same type of pile as a Continuous Flight Auger rig but using smaller, more lightweight equipment. This piling method is fast, cost-effective and suitable for the majority of ground types.[5][6]

Pier and grade beam foundation

[edit]

In drilled pier foundations, the piers can be connected with grade beams on which the structure sits, sometimes with heavy column loads bearing directly on the piers. In some residential construction, the piers are extended above the ground level, and wood beams bearing on the piers are used to support the structure. This type of foundation results in a crawl space underneath the building in which wiring and duct work can be laid during construction or re-modelling.[7]

Speciality piles

[edit]

Jet-piles

[edit]

In jet piling high pressure water is used to set piles.[8] High pressure water cuts through soil with a high-pressure jet flow and allows the pile to be fitted.[9] One advantage of Jet Piling: the water jet lubricates the pile and softens the ground.[10] The method is in use in Norway.[11]

Micropiles

[edit]

Micropiles are small diameter, generally less than 300mm diameter, elements that are drilled and grouted in place.  They typically get their capacity from skin friction along the sides of the element, but can be end bearing in hard rock as well. Micropiles are usually heavily reinforced with steel comprising more than 40% of their cross section. They can be used as direct structural support or as ground reinforcement elements.  Due to their relatively high cost and the type of equipment used to install these elements, they are often used where access restrictions and or very difficult ground conditions (cobbles and boulders, construction debris, karst, environmental sensitivity) exists or to retrofit existing structures.  Occasionally, in difficult ground, they are used for new construction foundation elements. Typical applications include underpinning, bridge, transmission tower and slope stabilization projects.[6][12][13][14]

Tripod piles

[edit]

The use of a tripod rig to install piles is one of the more traditional ways of forming piles. Although unit costs are generally higher than with most other forms of piling,[citation needed] it has several advantages which have ensured its continued use through to the present day. The tripod system is easy and inexpensive to bring to site, making it ideal for jobs with a small number of piles.[clarification needed]

Sheet piles

[edit]
Sheet piles are used to restrain soft soil above the bedrock in this excavation

Sheet piling is a form of driven piling using thin interlocking sheets of steel to obtain a continuous barrier in the ground. The main application of sheet piles is in retaining walls and cofferdams erected to enable permanent works to proceed. Normally, vibrating hammer, t-crane and crawle drilling are used to establish sheet piles.[citation needed]

Soldier piles

[edit]
A soldier pile wall using reclaimed railway sleepers as lagging.

Soldier piles, also known as king piles or Berlin walls, are constructed of steel H sections spaced about 2 to 3 m apart and are driven or drilled prior to excavation. As the excavation proceeds, horizontal timber sheeting (lagging) is inserted behind the H pile flanges.

The horizontal earth pressures are concentrated on the soldier piles because of their relative rigidity compared to the lagging. Soil movement and subsidence is minimized by installing the lagging immediately after excavation to avoid soil loss.[citation needed] Lagging can be constructed by timber, precast concrete, shotcrete and steel plates depending on spacing of the soldier piles and the type of soils.

Soldier piles are most suitable in conditions where well constructed walls will not result in subsidence such as over-consolidated clays, soils above the water table if they have some cohesion, and free draining soils which can be effectively dewatered, like sands.[citation needed]

Unsuitable soils include soft clays and weak running soils that allow large movements such as loose sands. It is also not possible to extend the wall beyond the bottom of the excavation, and dewatering is often required.[citation needed]

Screw piles

[edit]

Screw piles, also called helical piers and screw foundations, have been used as foundations since the mid 19th century in screw-pile lighthouses.[citation needed] Screw piles are galvanized iron pipe with helical fins that are turned into the ground by machines to the required depth. The screw distributes the load to the soil and is sized accordingly.

Suction piles

[edit]

Suction piles are used underwater to secure floating platforms. Tubular piles are driven into the seabed (or more commonly dropped a few metres into a soft seabed) and then a pump sucks water out at the top of the tubular, pulling the pile further down.

The proportions of the pile (diameter to height) are dependent upon the soil type. Sand is difficult to penetrate but provides good holding capacity, so the height may be as short as half the diameter. Clays and muds are easy to penetrate but provide poor holding capacity, so the height may be as much as eight times the diameter. The open nature of gravel means that water would flow through the ground during installation, causing 'piping' flow (where water boils up through weaker paths through the soil). Therefore, suction piles cannot be used in gravel seabeds.[citation needed]

Adfreeze piles

[edit]
Adfreeze piles supporting a building in Utqiaġvik, Alaska

In high latitudes where the ground is continuously frozen, adfreeze piles are used as the primary structural foundation method.

Adfreeze piles derive their strength from the bond of the frozen ground around them to the surface of the pile.[citation needed]

Adfreeze pile foundations are particularly sensitive in conditions which cause the permafrost to melt. If a building is constructed improperly then it can melt the ground below, resulting in a failure of the foundation system.[citation needed]

Vibrated stone columns

[edit]

Vibrated stone columns are a ground improvement technique where columns of coarse aggregate are placed in soils with poor drainage or bearing capacity to improve the soils.[citation needed]

Hospital piles

[edit]

Specific to marine structures, hospital piles (also known as gallow piles) are built to provide temporary support to marine structure components during refurbishment works. For example, when removing a river pontoon, the brow will be attached to hospital pile to support it. They are normal piles, usually with a chain or hook attachment.[citation needed]

Piled walls

[edit]
Sheet piling, by a bridge, was used to block a canal in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina damaged it.

Piled walls can be drivene or bored. They provide special advantages where available working space dictates and open cut excavation not feasible. Both methods offer technically effective and offer a cost efficient temporary or permanent means of retaining the sides of bulk excavations even in water bearing strata. When used in permanent works, these walls can be designed to resist vertical loads in addition lateral load from retaining soil. Construction of both methods is the same as for foundation bearing piles. Contiguous walls are constructed with small gaps between adjacent piles. The spacing of the piles can be varied to provide suitable bending stiffness.

Secant piled walls

[edit]

Secant pile walls are constructed such that space is left between alternate 'female' piles for the subsequent construction of 'male' piles.[clarification needed] Construction of 'male' piles involves boring through the concrete in the 'female' piles hole in order to key 'male' piles between. The male pile is the one where steel reinforcement cages are installed, though in some cases the female piles are also reinforced.[citation needed]

Secant piled walls can either be true hard/hard, hard/intermediate (firm), or hard/soft, depending on design requirements. Hard refers to structural concrete and firm or soft is usually a weaker grout mix containing bentonite.[citation needed] All types of wall can be constructed as free standing cantilevers, or may be propped if space and sub-structure design permit. Where party wall agreements allow, ground anchors can be used as tie backs.

Slurry walls

[edit]

A slurry wall is a barrier built under ground using a mix of bentonite and water to prevent the flow of groundwater. A trench that would collapse due to the hydraulic pressure in the surrounding soil does not collapse as the slurry balances the hydraulic pressure.

Deep mixing/mass stabilization techniques

[edit]

These are essentially variations of in situ reinforcements in the form of piles (as mentioned above), blocks or larger volumes.

Cement, lime/quick lime, flyash, sludge and/or other binders (sometimes called stabilizer) are mixed into the soil to increase bearing capacity. The result is not as solid as concrete, but should be seen as an improvement of the bearing capacity of the original soil.

The technique is most often applied on clays or organic soils like peat. The mixing can be carried out by pumping the binder into the soil whilst mixing it with a device normally mounted on an excavator or by excavating the masses, mixing them separately with the binders and refilling them in the desired area. The technique can also be used on lightly contaminated masses as a means of binding contaminants, as opposed to excavating them and transporting to landfill or processing.

Materials

[edit]

Timber

[edit]

As the name implies, timber piles are made of wood.

Historically, timber has been a plentiful, locally available resource in many areas. Today, timber piles are still more affordable than concrete or steel. Compared to other types of piles (steel or concrete), and depending on the source/type of timber, timber piles may not be suitable for heavier loads.

A main consideration regarding timber piles is that they should be protected from rotting above groundwater level. Timber will last for a long time below the groundwater level. For timber to rot, two elements are needed: water and oxygen. Below the groundwater level, dissolved oxygen is lacking even though there is ample water. Hence, timber tends to last for a long time below the groundwater level. An example is Venice, which has had timber pilings since its beginning; even most of the oldest piles are still in use. In 1648, the Royal Palace of Amsterdam was constructed on 13,659 timber piles that still survive today since they were below groundwater level. Timber that is to be used above the water table can be protected from decay and insects by numerous forms of wood preservation using pressure treatment (alkaline copper quaternary (ACQ), chromated copper arsenate (CCA), creosote, etc.).

Splicing timber piles is still quite common and is the easiest of all the piling materials to splice. The normal method for splicing is by driving the leader pile first, driving a steel tube (normally 60–100 cm long, with an internal diameter no smaller than the minimum toe diameter) half its length onto the end of the leader pile. The follower pile is then simply slotted into the other end of the tube and driving continues. The steel tube is simply there to ensure that the two pieces follow each other during driving. If uplift capacity is required, the splice can incorporate bolts, coach screws, spikes or the like to give it the necessary capacity.

Iron

[edit]

Cast iron may be used for piling. These may be ductile.[citation needed]

Steel

[edit]
Cutaway illustration. Deep inclined (battered) pipe piles support a precast segmented skyway where upper soil layers are weak muds.

Pipe piles are a type of steel driven pile foundation and are a good candidate for inclined (battered) piles.

Pipe piles can be driven either open end or closed end. When driven open end, soil is allowed to enter the bottom of the pipe or tube. If an empty pipe is required, a jet of water or an auger can be used to remove the soil inside following driving. Closed end pipe piles are constructed by covering the bottom of the pile with a steel plate or cast steel shoe.

In some cases, pipe piles are filled with concrete to provide additional moment capacity or corrosion resistance. In the United Kingdom, this is generally not done in order to reduce the cost.[citation needed] In these cases corrosion protection is provided by allowing for a sacrificial thickness of steel or by adopting a higher grade of steel. If a concrete filled pipe pile is corroded, most of the load carrying capacity of the pile will remain intact due to the concrete, while it will be lost in an empty pipe pile. The structural capacity of pipe piles is primarily calculated based on steel strength and concrete strength (if filled). An allowance is made for corrosion depending on the site conditions and local building codes. Steel pipe piles can either be new steel manufactured specifically for the piling industry or reclaimed steel tubular casing previously used for other purposes such as oil and gas exploration.

H-Piles are structural beams that are driven in the ground for deep foundation application. They can be easily cut off or joined by welding or mechanical drive-fit splicers. If the pile is driven into a soil with low pH value, then there is a risk of corrosion, coal-tar epoxy or cathodic protection can be applied to slow or eliminate the corrosion process. It is common to allow for an amount of corrosion in design by simply over dimensioning the cross-sectional area of the steel pile. In this way, the corrosion process can be prolonged up to 50 years.[citation needed]

Prestressed concrete piles

[edit]

Concrete piles are typically made with steel reinforcing and prestressing tendons to obtain the tensile strength required, to survive handling and driving, and to provide sufficient bending resistance.

Long piles can be difficult to handle and transport. Pile joints can be used to join two or more short piles to form one long pile. Pile joints can be used with both precast and prestressed concrete piles.

Composite piles

[edit]

A "composite pile" is a pile made of steel and concrete members that are fastened together, end to end, to form a single pile. It is a combination of different materials or different shaped materials such as pipe and H-beams or steel and concrete.

'Pile jackets' encasing old concrete piles in a saltwater environment to prevent corrosion and consequential weakening of the piles when cracks allow saltwater to contact the internal steel reinforcement rods

Construction machinery for driving piles into the ground

[edit]

Construction machinery used to drive piles into the ground:[15]

  • Pile driver is a device for placing piles in their designed position.
  • Diesel pile hammer is a device for hammering piles into the ground.
  • Hydraulic hammer is removable working equipment of hydraulic excavators, hydroficated machines (stationary rock breakers, loaders, manipulators, pile driving hammers) used for processing strong materials (rock, soil, metal) or pile driving elements by impact of falling parts dispersed by high-pressure fluid.
  • Vibratory pile driver is a machine for driving piles into sandy and clay soils.
  • Press-in pile driver is a machine for sinking piles into the ground by means of static force transmission.[16]
  • Universal drilling machine.

Construction machinery for replacement piles

[edit]

Construction machinery used to construct replacement piles:[15]

  • Sectional Flight Auger or Continuous Flight Auger
  • Reverse circulation drilling
  • Ring bit concentric drilling

See also

[edit]
  • Eurocode EN 1997
  • International Society for Micropiles
  • Post in ground construction also called earthfast or posthole construction; a historic method of building wooden structures.
  • Stilt house, also known as a lake house; an ancient, historic house type built on pilings.
  • Shallow foundations
  • Pile bridge
  • Larssen sheet piling

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations, 2009-09-09, accessed 2010-04-12.
  2. ^ a b Constructing a turbine foundation Archived 21 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine Horns Rev project, Elsam monopile foundation construction process, accessed 2010-04-12]
  3. ^ Horns Revolution Archived 14 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Modern Power Systems, 2002-10-05, accessed 2010-04-14.
  4. ^ "Lynn and Inner Dowsing description". Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 23 July 2010.
  5. ^ a b Handbook on Under-reamed and bored compaction pile foundation, Central building research institute Roorkee, Prepared by Devendra Sharma, M. P. Jain, Chandra Prakash
  6. ^ a b Siel, Barry D.; Anderson, Scott A. "Implementation of Micropiles by the Federal Highway Administration" (PDF). Federal Highway Administration (US). cite journal: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. ^ Marshall, Brain (April 2000). "How House Construction Works". How Stuff Works. HowStuffWorks, Inc. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
  8. ^ "jet-pile". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
  9. ^ Guan, Chengli; Yang, Yuyou (21 February 2019). "Field Study on the Waterstop of the Rodin Jet Pile". Applied Sciences. doi:10.3390/app9081709. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
  10. ^ "Press-in with Water Jetting". Giken.com. Giken Ltd. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
  11. ^ "City Lade, Trondheim". Jetgrunn.no. Jetgrunn AS. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
  12. ^ Omer, Joshua R. (2010). "A Numerical Model for Load Transfer and Settlement of Bored Cast In-Situ Piles". Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on Deep Foundations. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 20 July 2011.
  13. ^ "International Society for Micropiles". Retrieved 2 February 2007.
  14. ^ "GeoTechTools". Geo-Institute. Retrieved 15 April 2022.
  15. ^ a b McNeil, Ian (1990). An Encyclopaedia of the history of technolology. Routledge. ISBN 9780415147927. Retrieved 20 July 2022 – via Internet Archive.
  16. ^ "General description of the press-in pile driving unit". Concrete Pumping Melbourne. 13 October 2021. Archived from the original on 25 December 2022. Retrieved 20 July 2022.

References

[edit]
  • Italiantrivelle Foundation Industry Archived 25 June 2014 at the Wayback Machine The Deep Foundation web portal Italiantrivelle is the number one source of information regarding the Foundation Industry. (Link needs to be removed or updated, links to inappropriate content)
  • Fleming, W. G. K. et al., 1985, Piling Engineering, Surrey University Press; Hunt, R. E., Geotechnical Engineering Analysis and Evaluation, 1986, McGraw-Hill.
  • Coduto, Donald P. Foundation Design: Principles and Practices 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., 2001.
  • NAVFAC DM 7.02 Foundations and Earth Structures U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1986.
  • Rajapakse, Ruwan., Pile Design and Construction Guide, 2003
  • Tomlinson, P.J., Pile Design and Construction Practice, 1984
  • Stabilization of Organic Soils Archived 22 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  • Sheet piling handbook, 2010
[edit]
  • Deep Foundations Institute

 

About Cook County

Driving Directions in Cook County


Driving Directions From 42.088525008778, -88.079435634324 to
Driving Directions From 42.021124436568, -88.109125186152 to
Driving Directions From 42.017845685371, -88.11591807218 to
Driving Directions From 42.084324223519, -88.137710099374 to
Driving Directions From 42.10843482977, -88.114090738222 to
Driving Directions From 42.086153671225, -88.19640031169 to
Driving Directions From 42.051159627372, -88.202951526236 to
Driving Directions From 42.008657936699, -88.152725208607 to
Driving Directions From 42.007242948498, -88.153060682778 to
Driving Directions From 42.073881347839, -88.179224443136 to

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, some greener